Team | Year | Pos | G | IP | PO | A | E | Fld % | RF | Eff | Frm | Arm | ZR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rancho Cucamonga - A+ - U26
RAN - A+ - U26
|
2055 | 2B | 7 | 61.0 | 14 | 17 | 0 | 1.000 | 4.57 | 1.182 | - | - | 1.08 |
Rancho Cucamonga - A+ - U26
RAN - A+ - U26
|
2055 | SS | 108 | 976.1 | 184 | 332 | 16 | .970 | 4.76 | 1.009 | - | - | 0.69 |
Cedar Rapids - A - U25
CER - A - U25
|
2054 | 2B | 8 | 71.0 | 15 | 27 | 1 | .977 | 5.32 | .995 | - | - | -0.00 |
Cedar Rapids - A - U25
CER - A - U25
|
2054 | SS | 44 | 398.0 | 54 | 132 | 4 | .979 | 4.21 | 1.074 | - | - | 5.45 |
Rancho Cucamonga - A+ - U26
RAN - A+ - U26
|
2054 | SS | 27 | 231.0 | 42 | 70 | 2 | .983 | 4.36 | 1.027 | - | - | 1.09 |
New Westminster - A- - U25
NW - A- - U25
|
2053 | 2B | 7 | 54.0 | 13 | 16 | 0 | 1.000 | 4.83 | 1.245 | - | - | 0.86 |
New Westminster - A- - U25
NW - A- - U25
|
2053 | SS | 45 | 307.1 | 44 | 103 | 6 | .961 | 4.30 | .995 | - | - | 1.72 |
Rancho Cucamonga - A+ - U26
RAN - A+ - U26
|
2052 | SS | 7 | 60.0 | 10 | 20 | 1 | .968 | 4.50 | .972 | - | - | 0.10 |
New Westminster - A- - U25
NW - A- - U25
|
2052 | 2B | 17 | 127.0 | 30 | 40 | 1 | .986 | 4.96 | .973 | - | - | -0.76 |
New Westminster - A- - U25
NW - A- - U25
|
2052 | SS | 48 | 297.2 | 67 | 106 | 4 | .977 | 5.23 | 1.031 | - | - | 1.60 |
New Westminster - A- - U25
NW - A- - U25
|
2051 | SS | 67 | 511.0 | 69 | 156 | 3 | .987 | 3.96 | 1.055 | - | - | 3.95 |
Gainesville - R - U22
GAI - R - U22
|
2050 | SS | 70 | 578.2 | 66 | 204 | 7 | .975 | 4.20 | 1.002 | - | - | 0.48 |
Total | 2B | 39 | 313.0 | 72 | 100 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 1.18 | |
Total | SS | 416 | 3360.0 | 536 | 1123 | 43 | - | - | - | - | - | 15.08 |